|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
STREETSCAPES Can Nearly Half a Building Add Up to a Landmark?
While many of the other buildings have lost their ground-floor facades to retail alterations, only the Smith, Gray building has lost its top. Smith, Gray & Company was established in the mid-19th century, and by
the 1880's had a prosperous men's clothing store. In 1888, the firm put up a
new eight-story store designed by the architect Peter J. Lauritzen on the
odd-shaped lot at the intersection of Fulton and Nevins Streets and In 1892 the store caught fire, and the clock tower fell down to The Eagle called the location "the most conspicuous" corner in Early photographs show a trim, delicate early-Renaissance-style campanile
of light orange brick cross-banded with darker masonry. The lateral bands of
contrasting color offered, for The retail clothing business required other qualities besides enterprise and pluck. In 1894, someone pretending to be an official of the Young Men's Christian Association told the store he was planning to submit a big order to outfit missionaries, and he requested samples, including walking canes and patent leather shoes. He asked that the bill be sent to the Y.M.C.A. Something about a missionary in patent leather aroused skepticism from the
manager on duty, and the man, Edward H. Beckert, was arrested by the police
when the clothes were delivered. The Eagle said that Beckert, the head usher
at Smith, Gray is hardly known today, but an 1898 advertisement in The New York Times gives some impression of its humorous merchandising technique: "Big Bargains! Torrents of 'em. Fancy half-hose always associated with half-dollars, chokes down its pride to 21 cents." The laughter stopped in 1914 when the firm went into bankruptcy. By the
1940's the tower was still standing, but In 2003, the Brooklyn Heights Association and the Preservation Committee
of the Municipal Art Society became concerned about historic buildings in
downtown Since then, the Landmarks Preservation Commission has designated two early
telephone-company buildings - the Art Deco structure at For this viewer, though, none of them match the evocative power of the
1893 Smith, Gray building. In the retail chaos of this section of Meredith Hamilton, a governor of the Brooklyn Heights Association, says that the Smith, Gray tower, even in its much reduced state, is "worthy of landmarking," in part because of its prominent corner site. The Landmarks Preservation Commission initially rejected the building, but the commission's chairman, Robert Tierney, says it is taking a second look. Partly intact buildings are a problem for traditional advocates of historic preservation. Proposals are often given a semi-academic air, usually dependent on architectural style, design and physical integrity. Official preservation of a fragment like the Smith, Gray building is hard to justify. At what point do we start regulating nice passages of brickwork, or a surviving cornice bracket? Indeed, the three-story section of the building is forgettable. It is the remnant of the tower - and perhaps the imagined tower - that pull at the mind. It is, like the Roman Colosseum in Lord Byron's play "Manfred, "a noble wreck in ruinous perfection." E-mail: streetscapes@nytimes.com
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||